Secular Stagnation and Macroeconomic Policy

Secular stagnation theory has developed substantially recently and offers substantial insights that policymakers have yet to fully internalize. This paper reviews the considerations that led me to revive the secular stagnation idea, summarizes the theory as I understand it today, and argues that events since I started advocating the secular stagnation view have tended to confirm its predictions and reject those of its critics. It addresses the various objections, both theoretical and empirical, that have been put forward to the secular stagnation idea, and argues that if secular stagnation is a central macroeconomic issue, much of the conventional wisdom regarding macroeconomic policy needs to be rethought. Contrary to current orthodoxy, monetary policies may be able to have lasting impacts on levels of output but not to determine rates of inflation. Fiscal policies may be essential for assuring full employment and financial stability. Increases in government indebtedness may contribute to financial stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Similar content being viewed by others

Epilogue

Chapter © 2014

Modern Monetary Theory: Some Additional Dimensions

Article 30 March 2020

Post Keynesian Economics

Chapter © 2018

References

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charles W. Eliot University Professor and President Emeritus, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Mailbox 8, 79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA Lawrence H. Summers
  1. Lawrence H. Summers